#24 in a Series Examining Every Item on the Beloit Mindset List

They aren’t surprised to learn that the position of Top Spook at the CIA is an equal opportunity post. (Class of 2017, #39)

Can someone explain what this one means? My first thought was that around 1995, the CIA must have hired its first woman or non-white director. Thus, the Class of 2017, who must follow such things, would know that the position is an “equal opportunity post.”

However, it appears that every CIA director has been a white man.

The best I can figure is that the item is a reference to John Deutch’s attempt to hire more women and minorities. In 1995, he made Nora Slatkin the CIA’s executive director, which was the #3 position, not the “Top Spook.”

If that’s the case, this item strikes all the regular Mindset List chords: (1) It refers to something that happened around the birth year of the class. (2) The vast majority of the class knows nothing about it. (3) If they knew, most of them wouldn’t care. (4) It clearly isn’t a “touchstone” nor does it have anything to do with the class’s “mindset.” (5) It’s so poorly written that it’s not clear to what exactly it refers.

#23 in a Series Examining Every Item on the Beloit Mindset List

Planes have never landed at Stapleton Airport in Denver. (Class of 2017, #25)

Once in a while the Mindset List creators don’t even bother to pretend they are chronicling “cultural touchstones” or imparting useful information about incoming college students and just throw in some item that is likely based on some personal memory or inside joke. Maybe one of them or one of their friends used to live Denver. Maybe there is some senile professor at Beloit who gives long incoherent soliliques in class on getting lost in the Stapleton Airport when he was a boy. Maybe Tom McBride had a fruitless day looking at 1995 newspapers on microfiche and added this to the list so he wouldn’t feel like his day was a total loss. Maybe Stapleton is the last name of a girl Ron Nief took to the prom and “landed” is a double entendre.

Nothing is certain except that this item has nothing to do with the alleged purposes of the list and reflects the indifference Messrs. Nief & McBride have toward their audience.

Look at Who Else Is Bashing the Mindset List: A.V. Club, etc.

Our latest round-up of Class of 2017 Mindset List mockery:

The A.V. Club (Milwaukee edition) reports that “Beloit College releases lame Mindset List, wonders what’s up with kids and their Nintendos or whatever“:

The 2013 Mindset List—which examines the born-in-1995 class of 2017—is equally lame and random. For 18-year-olds, according to Nief and McBride, “a tablet is no longer something you take in the morning” (get it?), and “PayPal has replaced a pen pal as a best friend on line.” Incisive cultural analysis or a collection of Jay Leno-worthy groaners that betray a desperate “Old Man Yells At Cloud” fear of technology and youth? You decide.

Happily, the list has been drawing a fair amount of local and national criticism.

Bloggers at Unqualified Offerings and Orange Crate Art both offer some item-by-item criticism. The latter (Michael Leddy) links to his more in-depth critique from 2010:

What bothers me about the Beloit list involves some unspoken assumptions about reality and young adults. The list reads like a nightmare-version of the proposition that begins Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (1921): “Die Welt ist alles, was der Fall ist.” “The world is all that is the case” — all that is the case, that is, in the life-experience of a hypothetical eighteen-year-old American student.…

The Beloit list seems to suggest that if it hasn’t happened during your lifetime, well, it can’t really be real (witness the weirdly Orwellian statement that “Czechoslovakia has never existed”), or, at best, that you cannot be expected to know or care about it.…

An interviewer once asked the poet David Shapiro to name his favorite living poet. Wallace Stevens, he said. “But Stevens is dead,” the interviewer objected. “But not for me!” Shapiro replied.… I suspect that among this year’s incoming freshmen are some for whom Wallace Stevens (or Emily Dickinson, or E.E. Cummings, or Langston Hughes) is still living, for whom a pocket notebook and pen or pencil are tools of thought and introspection, and for whom Czechoslovakia is as real as it gets.

Finally, Hudson Hongo at Thought Catalog offers “The Real Mindset List for the Class of 2017” with entries such as these:

1. For this generation of entering college students, born in 1995, ALF, Ricky Martin and Queen Victoria have always been dead.

5. Thanks to global warming, they have zero words for snow.

6. “Eminem” has always been a scowling white man and if presented with an actual M&M an 18-year-old would die of shock.

7. They have never seen a squirrel.

12. “Sexting” has always been something you do with a phone, not a sextant.

19. College professors have always been able to trick lazy news editors into posting academically-flavored linkbait.

 

Class of 2017 First Day Media Roundup

Here are some highlights of first day media coverage of the Class of 2017 Mindset List and of Beloit Mindlessness:

As we discussed in an earlier post, Insider Higher Ed’s Scott Jaschik reported on our valient efforts in Whose Mindset?

We also received coverage from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel in Karen Herzog’s article “Is Beloit College’s Pop Culture Review a Mindset List or Mindlessness?” which includes a defense of the list from Tom McBride:

McBride said they “welcome critiques of all sort” because the list is intended to spark discussions.

“The most important thing, I believe, is the two at beloitmindlessness seem to be in a distinct but very small minority,” McBride said Tuesday, after this year’s list was released.

“Millions seem to look forward to the list every year — we get constant contacts about it, and the number of hits on the Beloit College website each year is in excess of one million,” he said.

They work hard on the list “to make sure its research is accurate and that we stay within time lines,” McBride said.

One out of two ain’t bad?

“But the main thing to know is that the list is just the tip of a much more thoughtful set of ideas and reflections about what is after all the subject of ‘King Lear’ and of nearly all Shakespeare’s comedies: the generation gap.”

So he’s claiming that he has access to a “much more thoughtful set of ideas and reflections” but gives us the Mindset List instead?

As a discussion-starter, the list provides a chance for those of different generations to trade “when I was 18 stories,” McBride said, “and it’s a great stimulus for discussion of such issues as the cost of college, the perils of multitasking, the meaning of entering ‘cyberspace,’ and whether or not this ‘sharing’ generation — for that’s what we think they are — will become the next great force in American life.”

McBride and Nief are asked every year to speak around the country about the list.

“Yes, you do have to be a bit thick-skinned,” McBride said of critics, “but we wouldn’t give anything for the fun we’ve had in so many conversations about the generation gap and the future with people from so many walks of life.”

We also were mentioned in an article in the (Cleveland) Plain Dealer.

As we discussed here, Daniel D’Addario bashed the Mindset List in a Salon article titled “Beloit College Is Trolling Us All.

Finally, a couple of radio personalities at Madison’s WMMM (105.5 FM) mock the Mindset List here. It’s probably most cogent discussion I’ve ever heard on FM radio.

 

#21 in a Series Examining Every Item on the Beloit Mindset List

Rites of passage have more to do with having their own cell phone and Skype accounts than with getting a driver’s license and car. (Class of 2017, #14)

Father: Sweetheart, times are tough, you can have a premium Skype account, or a driver’s license and a car, or we can throw you one hell of a debutante ball.

Daughter: That’s easy, I’ll take the Skype account!

#20 in a Series Examining Every Item on the Beloit Mindset List

“Dude” has never had a negative tone. (Class of 2017, #5)

I’m puzzled by this one. What does the word “tone” mean here?

Connotation? Voice modulation? Attitude?

If the meaning is that the word “dude” has lost its negative connotation, i.e., “a citified dandy”, that happened in the 1960s or 1970s.

If the meaning is that “dude” can’t be used to express a negative attitude, that’s clearly wrong. “Dude” can be used to signal disagreement, incredulity, disgust and other negative sentiments. The linguist Scott Kiesling calls this usage of dude a “confrontational stance attenuator.” Budweiser ran a series of commercials illustrating it in 2008.

In any case, this item contributes nothing to understanding the Class of 2017.

Further reading:

Kiesling, Scott F. 2004. “Dude.” American Speech 79(3):281-305.

Peters, Mark. 2010. “The History of Dude.” Good (April 24).

Swansburg, John. 2008. “Dude! How Great Are Those New Bud Light Ads?” Slate  (Jan. 28).

 

#19 in a Series Examining Every Item on the Beloit Mindset List

Their TV screens keep getting smaller as their parents’ screens grow ever larger. (Class of 2017, #12)

This item posits a generational gap—old people like big TVs, but young people like little TVs!—that is imaginary.

Smaller TV screens, on iPads, iPods, smartphones and the like, are popular—for younger people and older people. And so are big screen TVs.

The Class of 2017’s parents are buying bigger TVs because parents are usually the members of the family who buy family TVs. (They probably bought a lot of those small screens their kids use as well.)

It’s a problem when the self-designated experts in identifying generational divides don’t understand the difference between a generation gap and gap between what expenses parents and their children pay for.

 

Look at Who Else Is Bashing the Mindset List: Salon says “Beloit College is trolling us all”

Daniel D’Addario has an insightful article up at Salon titled “Beloit College is Trolling Us All.”

Some highlights:

Over time, Beloit’s professors ran out of things like “the AIDS crisis” and delved deeper into arcana or just meaningless incidents; the list’s entries often read like the setup for an observation, one that the list-makers aren’t willing to make but are happy to imply. Here are the only types of entries on the mind-set list:

  1. [any celebrity or public figure] has always been [either dead or, more commonly, famous]
  2. [something completely random that one thinks about quite infrequently] has always been the case
  3. College freshmen have never seen [consumer product that is an easy punch line — think eight-track tapes, Betamax, etc.] OR have always been able to [thing you can do with technology]
  4. College freshmen have never known about or experienced [news event from the recent past that everyone — EVERYONE! — has heard of or experienced]
  5. Bad puns about technology…
Aside from the hackiness of the puns, the thing that jumps out is that the majority of these things governing a student’s “mind-set” are actually not that important. Does an incoming college freshman have any idea who Bill Maher is? Has a spray-paint ban in Chicago any connection to, well, anything other than aspiring Illinois graffiti artists? The list’s particular obsession with technology signifies both a nostalgia that’s deeply uninteresting (these kids with their iPads — things were so much simpler when we all played “Pong,” or better yet, stickball in the street!) and a willingness to make sweeping implications about the degree to which Technology Has Changed Everything that is many things, but is not academic.

Beloit Mindlessness Makes Inside Higher Ed

Beloit Mindlessness is the focus of a story in today’s Inside Higher Ed, Whose Mindset?

Some highlights:

This year two anonymous professors — one from a large public university and the other from a community college — have declared their intent to destroy the list, which has been going strong since 1998. They are unveiling a site — Beloit Mindlessness— that is “dedicated to the mockery and eventual destruction of the Beloit mindset list.”…

The two professors specifically focus on the issue of relating everything to events that took place 18 years ago. “Each year’s list is constructed — and this point bears repeating over and over — by a couple guys going to a library and looking at microfiche of things that happened 18 years earlier,” Beloitmindlessness says. “Clearly this makes absolutely no sense. A person’s ‘mindset’ — their understanding of how the world works, their values and interests, and so on — tends to be shaped by things that happened to them once they developed an understanding of their social environment more sophisticated than a newborn’s. Things that happened ten or five or even one year earlier are going to be far more important to an 18-year-old than things than happened 18 years ago.”…

Asked why he would spend so much time on a site to take down the Mindset List, Disgruntled Professor said via e-mail: “It makes people in higher education look stupid. Students look stupid because they are portrayed as solipsistic idiots who don’t know anything about the world before they were born. It portrays professors as out-of-touch coots who use their class time to prattle on about who shot J.R., Madonna, the color of M&Ms and other trivia. It makes academic researchers look stupid because it is one of the most widely covered ‘reports’ on academic life — and it is of abysmal quality.”

And here is a response from Mindset co-creator Tom McBride:

Via e-mail, McBride said that he found the new site amusing, but that “the authors of the ‘mindless’ list are misreading the Mindset List. The point is not to portray today’s college students as lazy and solipsistic. On the contrary, we began our list 18 years ago because we were tired of other lists that did just that.”

I’ve read quite a bit about the creation of the Mindset list and this is the first time I’ve heard the claim that the list was made in response to even dumber and more condescending lists. I’d like to see an earlier version of this claim and an example of one of these other lists.

It’s hard to imagine anything more solipsistic than believing that your birthdate is the dividing line between “never” and “always”—which is how college students are portrayed in the Mindset List.

He added that the goals of the list include “to provide a concise overview of what has happened in the short lifetimes of entering college students — and to detail what has, in effect, always been ‘normal’ for them. It is not about their ignorance or navel-gazing or anything at all like that.” Further, McBride said he and Nief hoped “to spark intergenerational conversations within homes and classrooms” and “to remind teachers that some of their allusions and references are going to need a bit of explanation.”

The lists do not “provide a concise overview of what has happened in the short lifetimes of entering college students” because of their relentless focus on things that happened around the time of their birth.

McBride added: “Even sardonic parody is, perhaps, a perverse form of flattery. The verve of Beloit Mindlessness is itself ample testimony that students are very smart and industrious!”

Well, we’re actually professors, not college students, but that’s the level of accuracy we’ve come to expect from the Beloit Mindset List.

#18 in a Series Examining Every Item on the Beloit Mindset List

There has never been a Barings Bank in England. (Class of 2017, #56)

An earlier post in our continuing series examining every item on the Beloit Mindset List was an overview of 20 items about things that happened outside the United States, most of which were clearly not “cultural touchstones” for 18-year-old Americans, including the presence of McDonald’s in China and Moscow, the availability of Pepsi in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City, and the Royal New Zealand Navy’s daily ration of rum.

I think we can safely agree that the non-existence of a British Bank is similarly of no significance for understanding the mindset of incoming U.S. college students.